Bombay HC Orders SIT Probe into Fatal 'Assault' on Man by Cops; Says Police Brutality One Side of Coin
Bombay HC Orders SIT Probe into Fatal 'Assault' on Man by Cops; Says Police Brutality One Side of Coin
The bench was hearing a petition filed by an advocate, Firdause Irani, raising concerns over police "excesses" while enforcing the COVID-19 lockdown which was first declared in March-end. 

The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Mumbai police commissioner to set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to conduct a probe against four policemen who allegedly fatally assaulted a 22-year-old man here while imposing the COVID-19 lockdown in March.

The SIT should comprise two senior police officials and carry out the probe expeditiously, said a division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Anuja Prabhudessai. The bench ordered constitution of SIT after observing it was not satisfied with the probe being conducted in the case since April by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bandra division.

There are prima facie allegations of police excess committed on the deceased victim. Hence, we expected the Mumbai police to complete the probe with utmost expedition.

"However, the situation that emerges leaves a lot tobe desired, the court said in its order. "We have no option but to direct the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising two senior police officers of impeccable integrity and unquestionable competence within 24 hours, it added.

The court said it expects the new probe team to submit a charge-sheet within a month. We hope and trust that the SIT shall fairly and freely complete the investigation and submit a charge-sheet before the competent court within a month, the court said.

The bench was hearing a petition filed by an advocate, Firdause Irani, raising concerns over police "excesses" while enforcing the COVID-19 lockdown which was first declared in March-end.

Irani, in his plea, pointed out the case related to one Raju Devendra, whose family alleged that on March 29 night, when they were going to their relatives place, a police team chased them and caught him in suburban Vile Parle.

The policemen allegedly informed the relatives that they were taking Devendra to the suburban Juhu police station, the plea said. The next morning, the police informed the family that Devendra was found lying at a nearby chowk (square) and declared dead when taken to hospital, the petition said.

The police initially claimed the man died after he was assaulted by a mob who suspected him of committing a robbery, it said. Last month, the Maharashtra government told the high court that as per CCTV footage, Devendra was assaulted by four police constables.

On Monday, government pleader Purnima Kantharia told the HC that a departmental inquiry has been initiated against the four constables who were placed under suspension by an order dated July 31.

The court, however, was not satisfied just with their suspension.

They will get a salary without doing any work. We are not at all impressed with the state of affairs, Chief Justice Datta noted. The court posted the plea for further hearing on September 21.

Police Brutality Just One Side of Coin, Says HC

The Court said "police brutality" during the lockdown is only one side of the coin, and noted that many citizens are not complying with restrictions imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19.

"There are black sheep everywhere," a division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Anuja Prabhudessai observed while hearing the petition filed by advocate Firdause Irani.

Irani's counsel Gopal Sankarnarayan told the court on Monday that they have 13 videos showing police excesses on people while imposing the lockdown orders.

"Policemen are seen assaulting people with lathis or slapping them without first asking the reason why they are travelling, he said. The high court, however, said there are two sides to the story.

"Police brutality is only one side of the coin. The truth is that there are many amongst us who do not care about the lockdown guidelines and do not comply with restrictions. There are black sheep everywhere, Chief Justice Datta said.

Sankarnarayan argued that even if there are violators of lockdown restrictions, this does not give police the right to assault any person.

To this, the court said it cannot sit to decide in which case or situation the use of lathis, teargas or force may be required. "Every case or situation cannot be painted with the same brush, Chief Justice Datta said.

The court said if people violate laws, then they have to be dealt with strong hands.

"Police has been given the task to safeguard interests of the general public. In such a situation, some policemen think just because they have a lathi they can use it, Chief Justice Datta said.

The bench directed the petitioner to submit his suggestions on how police should handle such violators. "We will then see if police can be asked to follow the suggestions, the court said.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://popochek.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!