ED Takes Contradictory Stands Before Court, Accused Walk Free Without Bail in Money Laundering Case
ED Takes Contradictory Stands Before Court, Accused Walk Free Without Bail in Money Laundering Case
The accused Narendra Kumar Rai, Rajesh Mathur and Yogender Pal Gupta were summoned as accused by the court after filing of a charge sheet by the Enforcement Directorate in the case.

New Delhi: In a surprising turn of events, three persons summoned as accused in a money laundering case also involving journalist Upender Rai, on Saturday walked free from a Delhi court without even securing bail.

As per law, if an accused is not arrested by the prosecuting agency during probe, he will have to secure bail from the court on his first appearance before it on summons.

If the court refuses to grant bail, the accused will have to go to judicial custody.

The accused Narendra Kumar Rai, Rajesh Mathur and Yogender Pal Gupta were summoned as accused by the court after filing of a charge sheet by the Enforcement Directorate in the case.

However, after they appeared before Additional Sessions Judge Rakesh Syal on Saturday and moved bail applications, ED's special public prosecutor Rajiv Awasthi told the court that there was no need of bail since they were not arrested during the investigation.

The ED took contradictory stands before the court with Awasthi saying there was no need to secure bail, whereas ED's other SPP, Nitesh Rana, submitting that all the accused persons be send to judicial custody till the bail is granted or accused can leave the court only after interim bail.

Rana insisted that the bail was not only required rather the agency would oppose their applications.

The court, thereafter, noted the submission made by the counsel from both the sides and let the accused go.

ED, meanwhile, opposed the bail application of journalist Upendra Rai, the main accused in the case which relates to alleged extortion and dubious financial transactions.

Advocate A R Aditya, appearing for the agency, told the court that the accused may influence witnesses and hamper the probe if released on bail.

In his application, the Delhi-based scribe claimed he was not required for further custodial interrogation and no purpose will be served by keeping him in custody.

ED told the court that Rai had extorted money from various persons, claiming he had information against them as he was a journalist and that thousands of crore of rupees were extorted.

The agency also told the court that Rai was influential and he may destroy evidence and flee from justice if he comes out of jail.

The journalist was arrested on June 8 last year by the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) at the Tihar jail here, moments after he secured bail in a Central Bureau of Investigation case related to alleged extortion and dubious financial transactions.

He was arrested by the CBI on May 3 for allegedly indulging in dubious financial transactions, getting an airport access pass made by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) by furnishing false information, alleged extortion and manipulation of an Income Tax Department case against a Mumbai-based businessman.

However, he recently secured bail from the Delhi High Court in the CBI case.

The ED had registered a money laundering case against him based on the CBI FIR. Rai has denied before the court all allegations levelled against him.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://popochek.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!